I Say What I See: The Tug of Power and the Echo of the People Popularism and Elitism in a Fractured Age

NoahJune222

In contemporary political discourse, the terms popularism and elitism often emerge as rhetorical opposites, yet their definitions, both in dictionaries and in practice, are far from static. Lexicographically, popularism refers to a political approach that emphasizes policies with broad public appeal, often prioritizing electoral viability over ideological purity. Elitism, by contrast, denotes a belief in the leadership or influence of a select, often intellectually or socially privileged group. These definitions offer a useful starting point, but they barely scratch the surface of how these concepts operate within real-world political ecosystems.
In practice, popularism can be wielded as a pragmatic strategy or dismissed as pandering, depending on the speaker’s vantage point. Likewise, elitism may be framed as a commitment to expertise and institutional integrity – or condemned as exclusionary and disconnected from the public will. The tension between these two frameworks is not merely semantic; it reflects deeper ideological battles over representation, legitimacy, and the role of public opinion in governance. This essay explores how these terms are defined, deployed, and contested across various political contexts, revealing the fluid boundaries between principle and performance.
To grasp the lived consequences of popularism and elitism, it is instructive to look beyond our own borders. Political landscapes across the globe offer vivid case studies where these philosophies have collided, evolved, and reshaped national destinies. In the United States, the rise of Donald Trump exemplified a form of popularism that weaponized anti-elite sentiment, even as it emerged from elite privilege. In Venezuela, Hugo Chávez’s populist revolution sought to dismantle entrenched hierarchies, only to give way to authoritarian excesses under Nicolás Maduro. Argentina’s Peronist legacy, meanwhile, reveals how popularism can forge enduring emotional bonds with the working class, while provoking fierce resistance from elite institutions. These examples are not merely historical footnotes; they are cautionary tales and instructive mirrors. By examining them, we can begin to distinguish the rhetorical allure of popularism from its structural impact, and the protective promise of elitism from its potential to alienate. In doing so, we equip ourselves with a more nuanced lens – one that helps us navigate our own political complexities with clarity and care.

Popularism and Elitism: Ideologies in Extremes
Popularism: The Voice of the People
Popularism champions the idea that political legitimacy springs directly from the will of the majority. It thrives on emotional connection, grassroots energy, and the belief that ordinary citizens know best.

When Popularism Works Well:
It revitalizes democracy by engaging disenfranchised groups.
It forces elites to listen and respond to public concerns.
It can dismantle outdated hierarchies and promote social justice.

When Popularism Goes Too Far:
It may reduce complex policy debates to simplistic slogans.
Leaders may bypass institutions in the name of “the people”, eroding checks and balances.
It risks empowering demagogues who manipulate public emotion for personal gain.
Real-World Echoes: In some populist regimes, initial promises of empowerment devolved into authoritarianism. The leader becomes the sole interpreter of the people’s will, silencing dissent and dismantling democratic norms.

Elitism: The Rule of the Qualified
Elitism asserts that governance should be led by those with superior knowledge, education, or experience. It values expertise, deliberation, and institutional continuity.

When Elitism Works Well:
It ensures decisions are informed by evidence and long-term thinking.
It protects democratic institutions from impulsive shifts in public mood.
It can foster innovation and stability through technocratic leadership.
When Elitism Goes Too Far:
It breeds arrogance and detachment from everyday realities.
It may suppress dissenting voices and alternative perspectives.
It risks entrenching privilege and creating a closed circle of power.
Real-World Echoes: In highly elitist systems, citizens may feel alienated and unheard. This can fuel backlash movements that reject expertise altogether, leading to political polarization and instability.

Final Thought for This Essay
Popularism and elitism are not inherently good or evil; they are tools of governance that reflect different values. But when either ideology becomes absolute, it distorts the democratic balance. Understanding their strengths and dangers is essential for any society that seeks to govern wisely.
Myanmar’s political history offers a textured canvas on which the tensions between popularism and elitism have been repeatedly inscribed. At various junctures, movements claiming to represent the “true will” of the people have risen in opposition to entrenched institutions, invoking cultural identity, religious solidarity, or national pride as rallying cries. These popularist currents, while energizing segments of the public, have at times veered into exclusionary rhetoric, casting minorities or dissenting voices as threats to unity. Conversely, elite-led governance, often rooted in military or bureaucratic hierarchies, has emphasized order, stability, and strategic control. While such elitism has occasionally delivered reforms and modernization, it has also risked detachment from the lived realities of ordinary citizens. The interplay between these forces – neither wholly virtuous nor entirely corrosive – has shaped Myanmar’s political evolution in ways that continue to echo today. By examining these patterns, we gain insight into how ideologies can both illuminate and obscure the path towards inclusive governance.
Conclusion: Between Ideals and Realities
Popularism and elitism, though often framed as opposites, are not merely competing ideologies; they are reflections of how societies wrestle with power, representation, and legitimacy. Each carries the potential to uplift or to fracture, depending on how far it is pushed and by whom. Popularism can awaken democratic energy, but when untethered from principle, it risks becoming a tool of manipulation. Elitism can safeguard institutional wisdom, yet when insulated from public sentiment, it may breed alienation and distrust. The challenge lies not in choosing one over the other, but in understanding how each functions, and how their extremes can distort the very ideals they claim to uphold.
This essay has sought to illuminate the contours of these two philosophies, drawing from global and local echoes to reveal their light and shadow. Yet the story does not end here. In a follow-up essay, I will turn to the difficult terrain of compromise and reconciliation – concepts that remain elusive in our current climate, but essential if we are to move beyond ideological entrenchment. For now, let this reflection serve as a foundation: a lens through which we might better understand the forces that shape our politics, and the choices that shape our future.

Views expressed in the article belong solely to the author

Subject-Image

  • I Say What I See: The Tug of Power and the Echo of the People Popularism and Elitism in a Fractured Age
EN-Subject Category
Political subject
Political-Local

Posted-Date

Related Subject

World Xi holds talks with Trump in Beijing
World Xi holds talks with Trump in Beijing
Chinese President Xi Jinping held talks with visiting US President Donald Trump at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Thursday. Transformation not seen in a century is accelerating across the globe, and the international situation is fluid and turbulent, said Xi. “Can China and the United States overcome the Thucydides Trap and create a new paradigm of major-country relations? Can we meet global challenges together and provide greater stability for the world? Can we build a bright future together for our bilateral relations in the interest of the well-being of the two peoples and the future of humanity? These are the questions vital to history, to the world and to the people,” said Xi. They are the questions of the times that the leaders of major countries need to answer together, he added. “I look forward to working together with you to set the course and steer the giant ship of China-US relations, so as to make 2026 a historic, landmark year that opens up a new chapter in China-US relations,” he said. “I have agreed with President Trump on a new vision of building a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability,” Xi said. The new vision will provide strategic guidance for bilateral relations over the next three years and beyond, and should be welcomed by the people of both countries as well as the international community, he said. The “constructive strategic stability” should be a positive stability with cooperation as the mainstay, a sound stability with moderate competition, a constant stability with manageable differences, and an enduring stability with promises of peace, Xi said. The building of a constructive China-US relationship of strategic stability should not be a mere slogan, but concrete action taken by both sides towards the same goal, he added. China-US economic ties are mutually beneficial and win-win in nature, said Xi. “Where disagreements and frictions exist, equal-footed consultation is the only right choice,” he said. — Xinhuagnlm
Wholeheartedly welcome dialogue with EAOs before 31 July
Wholeheartedly welcome dialogue with EAOs before 31 July
If there is no peace and stability in the country, development activities cannot be carried out in any way. Only when peace is ensured and nationwide stability is achieved can development work be implemented. Otherwise, it would be like construction efforts being carried out at the front while destructive activities follow behind.At the Union Government meeting held the other day, the President designated the period from 20 April to 31 July as the Union Government’s 100-day plan implementation period. He stated that, for the successful implementation of this plan, it is most important to carry out peace processes to ensure peace and stability in the country.Regarding the EAOs, the President stated that there are 43 agreements of Union Accords that were reached after the EAOs signed the agreement. The current government’s 100-day plan to discuss dialogue processes and Union Accord matters in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is an important step towards national development and is expected to bring about significant changes for the country. As a result, it is being warmly welcomed by all.As part of the government’s 100-day plan, the President has invited both Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) that have signed the NCA and those that have not yet signed to attend a dialogue to be held before 31 July. In addition, the government has also extended invitations to NCA-signatory groups that have not met with the government over the past five years, such as the KNU, CNF, and ABSDF, in addition to PDF, to participate in the dialogue. However, the President also pointed out that it would be wrong if, under the name of peace, unrealistic demands are made, and actions are taken merely to strengthen and sustain one’s own organizations.Regarding the EAOs, the President stated that there are 43 agreements of Union Accords that were reached after the EAOs signed the agreement. The current government’s 100-day plan to discuss dialogue processes and Union Accord matters in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is an important step towards national development and is expected to bring about significant changes for the country. As a result, it is being warmly welcomed by all.Since signs of peace and stability are beginning to emerge across the country, all relevant parties who will participate in the discussions are urged to act with consideration for the interests of the nation and the entire people. Those stakeholders have to carry out their responsibilities with the country’s interests and the public’s welfare in mind, and it should be prioritized above personal or group interests.Therefore, all stakeholders must firmly adhere to the principle that their own aspirations should align with the aspirations of the country and be in the form of proposals and discussions that can benefit the entire population. In every dialogue, it is necessary to base efforts on sincerity and openness and to work toward achieving outcomes that will benefit the country and its people.gnlm
Seek the best solution to end armed conflicts and restore peace
Seek the best solution to end armed conflicts and restore peace
State leaders and stakeholders in various arenas have been striving for the restoration of internal peace in successive eras, resulting in achieving peace in some areas of the nation. Due to various root causes, the ceasefire process between the government and relevant ethnic armed groups, leading to the restoration of peace, faded out in some parts of the nation.It can be observed that internal armed conflicts, which began just two months after independence, have still not been fully resolved till today. The persistence of these conflicts can be attributed in part to some armed groups following self-interest–driven agendas, as well as to weaknesses in the implementation of national political principles, which led to misunderstandings and misaligned beliefs and positions.It is important to continue fostering mutual respect, understanding, and compassion among ethnic groups, and to walk together on the path of “national solidarity” for the future of the nation and the next generation. So, the government has invited all ethnic armed groups to join peace talks so as to seek the best solution for ending armed conflicts and restoring internal peace with the purpose of building a peaceful and stable society.Since gaining independence, some have described Myanmar’s political journey as turbulent waves, while others have considered it a long and difficult path. Indeed, the political history of Myanmar after 1948 has been a mixture of both positive and negative developments. At one point, it was even noted as having one of the longest-lasting internal armed conflicts in Southeast Asia.In fact, every war or armed conflict is never separate from politics, so solutions must be sought and negotiated through political means. Today, political freedoms already exist in Myanmar. Matters that could not be spoken of before can now be openly discussed. Hopes that were once unimaginable can now be pursued, and even dreams that could not be dreamed before are now attainable. In other words, reforms are being initiated in nearly all aspects of the democratic system that countries around the world aspire to, bringing in new politics and a new culture. In any case, Tatmadaw has been able to initiate this democratic system desired by all citizens and has successfully carried out an important political transition.Everyone must strive to integrate the political and economic progress they have achieved so far with the ongoing efforts to build peace. In reality, achieving internal peace requires not only a ceasefire but also efforts to resolve the root causes of armed conflicts. Therefore, solutions must be pursued through political means.It is important to continue fostering mutual respect, understanding, and compassion among ethnic groups, and to walk together on the path of “national solidarity” for the future of the nation and the next generation. So, the government has invited all ethnic armed groups to join peace talks so as to seek the best solution for ending armed conflicts and restoring internal peace with the purpose of building a peaceful and stable society.gnlm
Bring prestige to Pyidaungsu Hluttaw as a recordable history
Bring prestige to Pyidaungsu Hluttaw as a recordable history
The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is the top structure in the legislative sector of Myanmar’s parliamentary institutions. In the democratic practice in Myanmar, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is established with Hluttaw representatives from the Pyithu and Amyotha Hluttaws.In accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw carries out legislation and oversight in exercising the three branches of State sovereign power, which are legislative, executive, and judicial, as its primary responsibilities to the extent possible through separation of powers and mutual checks and balances.At present, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, for its third term, is functional due to facts that the Hluttaw representatives have been elected by the people in the 2025 multiparty democratic general election in three phases. At a time when the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is operated, elected Hluttaw representatives and Defence Services Personnel Representatives from relevant Hluttaws have to be Pyidaungsu Hluttaw representatives who must serve duties to approve bills submitted and debated in the Pyithu Hluttaw and the Amyotha Hluttaw, as well as make final decisions on important matters of the State.Hluttaw representatives have to serve their responsibilities in accord with the Constitution in cooperation and unity with each other without committing inappropriate activities harnishing the image of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. When addressing any issue, representatives must be mindful of preventing disunity and fragmentation in their conduct and decisions. It is because those Hluttaw representatives were trustfully elected by the people. They have to strictly note that, as the role of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is of high significance, Hluttaw representatives must comply with the established laws and rules and conduct themselves as role models.The State and the majority of the people ultimately aim to establish a Union based on genuine, disciplined democracy and a federal system. Flourishing the multiparty democracy is very important for reaching the goal as early as possible. As such, all representatives from the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw have to focus on their responsibilities so as to build the Union based on democracy and a federal system as soon as possible.Hluttaw representatives have to serve their responsibilities in accord with the Constitution in cooperation and unity with each other without committing inappropriate activities harnishing the image of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. When addressing any issue, representatives must be mindful of preventing disunity and fragmentation in their conduct and decisions. It is because those Hluttaw representatives were trustfully elected by the people. They have to strictly note that, as the role of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is of high significance, Hluttaw representatives must comply with the established laws and rules and conduct themselves as role models.Without personal bias or party bias, the representatives should prioritize only the national interest and the interests of the State and its citizens, and engage in mutual respect and dialogue to ensure that better decisions emerge from differing viewpoints. If so, their actions will bring honour to both themselves and the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, setting a historic precedent in the Republic of the Union of Myanmar.gnlm
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Upholds Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Upholds Separation of Powers, Checks and Balances
Every law enacted by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw must primarily protect the interests of the State and its citizens rather than those of any organization or private entity.The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker extended greetings at the first regular session of the Third Pyidaungsu Hluttaw on its first day. The full text of the translated greetings is as follows: –First and foremost, I would like to extend my greetings, Mingalaba, to all and wish all Pyidaungsu Hluttaw representatives and distinguished guests attending the first day of the First Regular Session of the Third Pyidaungsu Hluttaw held today good health and peace of mind.I would like to state that I am deeply honoured and pleased that, having been elected as the Speaker of the Third Amyotha Hluttaw, I will, under Section 76 (a) of the Constitution, concurrently serve as the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker for a term of two and a half years, or 30 months.Today is the first day of the first regular session of the Third Pyidaungsu Hluttaw fully attended by Hluttaw representatives elected by the people based on their will in the 2025 multiparty democratic general election and Defence Services Personnel Hluttaw Representatives.Esteemed Pyidaungsu Hluttaw representatives,According to the historical events of our country and the demands of the current time, the State and the majority of the people ultimately aim to establish a Union based on genuine, disciplined democracy and a federal system. Flourishing the multiparty democracy is very important for reaching the goal as early as possible. Amid various difficulties and challenges along the path towards democracy, the current government, with relentless efforts and determination, successfully held a free, fair, and dignified multiparty general election in the presence of international observers. So, the Hluttaw meetings are held for those representatives elected by the people to serve the legislative responsibilities.During the first regular sessions of the third relevant Hluttaws, key matters of importance to the State and its citizens will be addressed. These include the election of the President and Vice-Presidents; the election of Speakers and Deputy Speakers of the Hluttaws; the formation of the Union Government; the appointment and assignment of duties to members of Union-level bodies; the formation of regional and state governments, including Chief Ministers and cabinets; and the establishment of Hluttaw affairs committees and joint committees. These procedures will be implemented with the approval of the Hluttaws.Esteemed Pyidaungsu Hluttaw representatives,Due to the prompt repair and rehabilitation efforts carried out following the damage caused by the major Mandalay earthquake on 28 March 2025, the Hluttaw sessions are held successfully at present. In line with the country’s situation and the dignity of its citizens, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw would like to respectfully express its special gratitude to the State Government and the National Defence and Security Council for reconstructing and restoring these grand Hluttaw buildings and for making thorough and well-prepared arrangements in advance to ensure that nothing is lacking for the attending Hluttaw representatives.The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is not only the body that approves bills submitted and debated in the Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw, but also the institution that makes final decisions on important matters of the State. Therefore, the role of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is of high significance. Likewise, the role of Pyidaungsu Hluttaw representatives is also important.Therefore, Hluttaw representatives are required to comply with the established laws and rules and to conduct themselves as role models. In addition, without personal cult or party bias, they should prioritize only the national interest and the interests of the State and its citizens, and engage in mutual respect and dialogue to ensure that better decisions emerge from differing viewpoints.Sometimes, when the Pyithu Hluttaw and the Amyotha Hluttaw have differing views on bills and they are discussed and decided in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, those representatives should not be influenced by institutional bias, ideology, or party allegiance. Instead, they should focus solely on producing better legal provisions and conducting discussions based on understanding and unity.The desire to ensure that the State remains stable, peaceful, and developed, and to build a genuine, disciplined, democratic and federal Union that achieves durable peace, is the shared aspiration and common goal of all of our Hluttaw representatives. Therefore, we should consult, coordinate, and deliberate on matters that will benefit the State and its citizens through mutual understanding, unity, and solidarity.The main duty of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is, in accordance with the Constitution, to carry out legislation and oversight in exercising the three branches of State sovereign power – legislative, executive, and judicial – to the extent possible through separation of powers and mutual checks and balances.Every law enacted and approved by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw must be one that primarily promotes the interests of the State and its citizens, rather than the interests of any organization or private entity. At present, outdated laws that are no longer consistent with current times and systems should be reviewed and analyzed, and amended or repealed as necessary. New laws that benefit the State and its citizens should be submitted, debated, and approved. In addition, the effectiveness and applicability of existing laws should be reassessed, and they should be amended where necessary.We, Hluttaw representatives, are required to thoroughly study and precisely comply with the legislative provisions contained in the Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, as well as the Hluttaw laws and rules. As members of the legislative body, we must work together in the Hluttaw, in cooperation with the executive and judicial branches, to deliberate and make decisions in the interests of the State and the people. Therefore, we should engage in discussions and carry out our duties based on the spirit of the Union and cooperation.Esteemed Hluttaw representatives,In conclusion, I would like to state that, during my tenure as Speaker of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, I will work with integrity and loyalty, giving priority to the realization of a Union based on genuine, disciplined democracy and a federal system desired by the citizens of the country. In this Hluttaw, which operates in accordance with democratic practices, I urge all of us to work together in unity so that the laws, rules, and Hluttaw traditions we follow will become good precedents and exemplary practices for future generations. I also conclude by expressing my confidence that we will be able to build a Hluttaw that the public can trust.gnlm
Discuss the voices of people at Hluttaw sessions
Discuss the voices of people at Hluttaw sessions
The free and fair multiparty democratic general election was successfully held in three phases, and dates have already been set for convening the first regular sessions of the respective third-term Hluttaws, together with the members of parliament who were elected as representatives of the people.In the 2025 multiparty democratic general election, more than 13.14 million voters cast their ballots out of over 24.22 million eligible voters in 263 townships where the election was held. The voter turnout was 54.22 per cent. Since those elected were chosen by people who support democracy, they are expected to work for the benefit of the nation with patriotism and a spirit of love for the country. Although this election was conducted amid various difficulties, unlike previous elections, political parties enthusiastically participated and competed in the process. Likewise, voters fulfilled their responsibilities as citizens by actively and conscientiously coming out to cast their votes.The entire people of Myanmar are hoping for the country’s political situation to reach the best possible condition. With such expectations, they overwhelmingly cast their votes in the election. The ultimate objective of politics is nation-building. People with different political views and differing opinions must prioritize national interests and choose the best possible approaches in order to contribute to the development of the country. In carrying out political activities, they must act courageously for the good of the nation, free from personal bias, party bias, and feelings of favouritism or hostility.The first regular session of the Pyithu Hluttaw will commence on 16 March 2026, of the Amyotha Hluttaw on 18 March, and of the Region and State Hluttaws on 20 March. When Hluttaw representatives arrive in Nay Pyi Taw, arrangements have already been coordinated in advance with the relevant offices, departments, and organizations for transportation to and from designated locations. Accommodation has also been prepared with the necessary facilities for Hluttaw representatives. The respective Hluttaw offices have also made prior preparations to ensure that the procedures and tasks to be carried out by Hluttaw representatives in each Hluttaw can proceed smoothly and conveniently.For the successful convening of the third-term Hluttaw sessions, news media organizations recognized as the fourth estate in a multiparty democratic system must systematically comply with the prescribed rules and regulations related to news gathering on discussions about the voices of the people by Hluttaw representatives within the Hluttaw. The Ministry of Information has taken the lead, in cooperation with the Myanmar Press Council and the Myanmar Foreign Correspondents Club, to systematically arrange media corners.The entire people of Myanmar are hoping for the country’s political situation to reach the best possible condition. With such expectations, they overwhelmingly cast their votes in the election. The ultimate objective of politics is nation-building. People with different political views and differing opinions must prioritize national interests and choose the best possible approaches in order to contribute to the development of the country. In carrying out political activities, they must act courageously for the good of the nation, free from personal bias, party bias, and feelings of favouritism or hostility.gnlm
© Copyright 2024 SAC All Rights Reserved.